Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Pitch Wars: The Story So Far

So the ship has sailed and the submissions are in for Pitch Wars. The avalanche began December 2. The mail fairies sorted the applications for us and we gained access to our submissions on December 3. Today is December 4.

I haven't begun to read mine yet, and I am frightened.


I ended up being the ninth most popular mentor out of the forty-six of us (well, at least that was my "rank" when I counted at the beginning of yesterday). I received over seventy hopefuls. Three of our mentors (that I counted) got over 100 submissions. (Good luck, ladies.)

We've been having a few e-mail issues, and those have clogged up our process, but I think we've got it straightened out now. But I still wouldn't have started yet. For the record, it's mostly because I got a book deal at a kind of difficult time, and my publisher's requests for information have kept me a bit busy the last few days. I'll be able to start devouring submissions when I get through with my publisher's questionnaire.

But once I start, here's how I plan to handle my submissions!

  1. I will open each submission and read the query letter. I will make notes on what I like and don't like.

  2. If the query letter makes me want to read the material, I will read the included pages. That's right--I may actually not read them at all. Just like an agent. I'm thinking most of my potential mentees will at least write a query letter well enough to make me want to read the pages, but there are some who don't. I will make notes on the writing.

  3. I will prepare a letter that outlines each submitter's strengths and weaknesses. This may sound weird, but the MORE criticism an author gets from me, the BETTER they probably already are. If there's a lot to fix in the query and pages, I will not be interested, and I will consider the time investment too costly. So if I crap all over an author, they're probably almost there, because I think they're close enough to be worth the spanking.

  4. I will privately rank each submission. As I read through them, I will put them in a list, putting the ones I like best at the top and the ones I like least at the bottom. At the end, I'll have a quantitative list of every potential mentee from best to worst (in my opinion). The top three will be my mentee and alternates.

  5. Before I've decided for sure on my top three, I may request additional pages from a small portion of my applicants. I request pages very, very rarely. I will almost definitely request more material from fewer than ten participants, and it will probably be fewer than five. But I will definitely request those three chapters from anyone I'm considering as an alternate or mentee. I probably will NOT be requesting synopses or outlines. Your requests from me will be late. Probably not for a few days. Don't lose hope. You will not find out whether you are one of my picks until Brenda announces them on December 11, but if you get a pages request from me, you will know you're on a very short list.

  6. Authors who have applied to me are invited to stay in touch throughout and after the contest.  Even for those I do not choose, I may be available in the future to critique submission materials and even full books, but only if we develop a rapport and they don't respond to feedback by throwing hissy fits. (I'm afraid this has happened to me.) I acquired a very sweet critique partner in my last contest mentoring experience and I edited her entire book even though doing so wasn't part of the contest. One of my other picks from last year is agented (though it didn't happen through our contest), and another has gone on to self-publish (and seems very popular!). I really hope I don't lose a bunch of Twitter followers because of people being sad or mad that I didn't choose them--that has also happened--but if you stay in touch with  me, I'll be happy to give you all the help I can once the contest and my publishing preparations aren't taking up the lion's share of my time.
     
I LOVE new writer friends, and if an entrant has an active blog that's at least partially about writing, I may be interested in following them and adding them to my blogroll if we have some positive interaction! Let me know, y'all!

14 comments:

  1. I love the way you're doing things! I never understand why people get mad at being rejected...it's just part of the journey in writing. I've racked up plenty of rejections on another project and I never got mad. Sad, perhaps, but never responded back to an agent negatively! Good luck reading!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right, glad to hear you're supportive of my process! I think rejection does teach people how to improve, and I think it also weeds out the people who want all of the good and none of the bad, but it can be SO painful to deal with. And then when you get signed, you get to turn right around and deal with rejection from PUBLISHERS! Oh boy is that fun! You know?

      I made a comic about it:
      Wallpaper

      Delete
  2. It's disappointing that people get mad at you for your feedback. Why submit to something like this if you don't want feedback? If they think it's perfect, they should just send it off to agents.

    The really disappointing thing about that is that it discourages people from giving feedback. I've lost track of how many agents blogs say they don't give feedback because they've been attacked in the past when they do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty much. Though they do send it off to agents, and get rejected, and react to rejection with "THEY JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD!" rather than " . . . Maybe I need to improve?"

      Delete
  3. I really appreciate the way you're doing things! It's extremely thorough and thoughtful, and I'll be pleased just to get even a few sentences feedback on my query even if it makes your eyes bleed. That's very generous of you, and I appreciate how much you like helping other writers be their best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I give pretty decent feedback even if I don't care for what you're doing, so we'll see. We're all really on the same side here: We write stories, and we want to share them. I love pointing people in the right direction and giving them enough to go on so they can teach themselves the rest!

      Delete
  4. While I'm not surprised that people throw hissy fits when they're rejected/get harsh criticism, I can't really understand *why*. Whenever those things happen to me I get mad or upset at myself or my work (a bit irrationally at times) but never at the person who gave me a critique. It just seems...weird.

    But anyways. Woah, so much work. I hope you have fun though! I'm sure there'll be some great things for you to see :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I'm hoping to discover something delightful and fantastic that I can't wait to work with! I love other writers and I'm really jazzed about cultivating that awesome bond with another writer that happens when I develop a relationship with their work!

      Delete
  5. It's a shame that people give you a hard time for being honest. I know I've been rejected lots of times without any reason, and being ignored is more demoralizing than any critique could be. Good luck :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, because with rejection (especially rejection with constructive feedback!) you can build toward improving! With people ignoring you, it's much harder to know what you need to do better.

      Delete
  6. Wow, you're doing so much for everyone! I know people have said it already, but a big thanks for all the time and effort (and precision!) your critiquing must take. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. :) Sometimes it's hard to figure out what to say if I don't really know what will make a query or writing sample better, but I still try, and if I feel like I don't really know what I'm talking about I admit that.

      Delete
  7. You are definitely an awesome mentor.

    ReplyDelete